RIN prices, the tool to show compliance with US mandates are
still cheap but have risen by over 60% in the last two weeks, far more than
maize prices themselves. It looks like the biofuel sector is taking notice and
starting to ration itself. RIN carry was very high into the year and so with
this short crop we have that quantity to play with in reducing maize consumption this
year. With the way the mandates work and some approximation of carry in, there
is about 25 million metric tons that could be cut from biofuel maize use.
Now it won’t be that large, folks won’t want to expose themselves to the risk
of carrying out NO RINs into 2013, but we could see a reduction in RIN stocks and
thus less maize demanded than would be determined strictly by equating the
mandate gap with the maize needed to fill it and a decline in use of maize for
ethanol is certainly a strong possibility. Add to that the little understood
fact that the carry in limit applies to totals and not the gap created for
maize and that is another (admittedly small) 3.5 million metric tons of play in
maize demand.
RIN prices in the 2012 vintage have moved up from a recent low (not giving exact prices) of just over 1 cent a gallon go just under 2 cents a gallon in the last couple of weeks. Seems to me there is some upside potential in this market, of course there is always the risk the EPA could wade in with a waiver cutting RIN holders off at the knees if things get bad enough.......
Some Math at the extreme (and in bushels!)
RIN prices in the 2012 vintage have moved up from a recent low (not giving exact prices) of just over 1 cent a gallon go just under 2 cents a gallon in the last couple of weeks. Seems to me there is some upside potential in this market, of course there is always the risk the EPA could wade in with a waiver cutting RIN holders off at the knees if things get bad enough.......
Some Math at the extreme (and in bushels!)
My math was off in the metric
tons calculation so I’ve fixed it.
I’m going to talk in calendar
year because that is the mandate timing, you have to convert back to guess at
the effect in crop years, so I’ll use a standard conversion and the calendar
numbers.
If your corn grind is 4.82
million bushels (2.74 gallons per bushel) to make the conventional mandate gap
(this gap in the mandates that maize starch ethanol can access) of 13.2 billion
gallons, then this represents a use with no flexibility or RIN carry. However
there is 20% RIN carry in allowed and we most certainly over produced for the
2011 mandate. BUT it isn’t 20% of the 13.6 mandate because that isn’t really a
mandate, it is a GAP in the mandate system. It is really 20% of the individual
mandates and you can’t exceed 20% carry in on any of them individually or in
the total. So let’s see what we have with respect to the other mandates,
probably zero carry in for cellulosics, we probably didn’t import much more
than we needed for the 2011 obligation (tariff effect?) and with all the
fraudulent biodiesel RINs and the weird inversion of 2011 to 2012 vintage
biodiesel RINs prices I doubt we had much of any carryover of biodiesel RINs
into 2012. So if we ignore those (say the advanced and sub-categories RIN carry
are zero), the amount that you could use of maize based ethanol RINs carried in
from 2011 isn’t ( 0.2*13.2billion gallons) = 2.64 billion
gallons of RIN carry but the whole total of (0.2*15.2billion gallons) = 3.04
billion gallons of RIN carry potentially. So at the extreme, if you have zero
carry in of non-maize biofuels and you carry out zero RINS into 2013, there is
3.04/2.74*1000 = 1.1 billion bushels
(28 million metric tons) of play
in the demand for maize to produce biofuels. This is of course at the
extreme because it probably wasn’t zero carry of non-maize RINs into 2012 (but
I bet it isn’t large) and at the same time, I don’t know for certain how many
conventional (maize based in this case) RINs were carried into 2012 but you
could approximate this. Also folks won’t want to carry in zero RINs into 2012
so they won’t run RIN stocks down to zero, but at any rate, there is room for
some rationing on the ethanol side!
So 4.82 billion bushels needed?
What fraction of the 1.1 billion bushes it could potentially be reduced exists
and is reasonable? (again, I think this is a very large fraction) and how much
are folks willing to draw down RIN stocks (the bigger question and why RIN
prices will be interesting this year)?
I’m not going to yet guess what
grind will actually be.
Seth
No comments:
Post a Comment